• Print
  • Send to a friend
  • Comment (2)
  •  

Assessing aquaculture

 Miranda Pryor, executive director of the Newfoundland and Labrador Aquaculture Industry Association, said finfish farmed provincially are done so in a safe manner.    Photo by Andrew Robinson/The Telegram   

Miranda Pryor, executive director of the Newfoundland and Labrador Aquaculture Industry Association, said finfish farmed provincially are done so in a safe manner.  Photo by Andrew Robinson/The Telegram 

Published on September 6, 2012
Published on September 6, 2012
Andrew Robinson  RSS Feed

: Event questions impact of farmed fish on wild salmon

Topics :
Salmonid Council of Newfoundland and Labrador , Newfoundland and Labrador Aquaculture Industry Association , Department of Fisheries and Oceans , Newfoundland and Labrador , Conne River , Atlantic Canada

Earlier this year, Donald Hutchens attended meetings to discuss what can be done for salmon fishing Area 4 on the south coast of Newfoundland, now classified as a threatened area. He said its signature river, Conne River, has witnessed a serious decline in its salmon population since 2001.

“What’s the only river that has a large (finfish aquaculture) in its history? It’s the Conne River,” said Hutchens, president of the Salmonid Council of Newfoundland and Labrador. “We put that argument to the (aquaculture) industry, and they said, ‘Well, prove it to us.’”

Hutchens was among several people who spoke Tuesday evening at an event held in St. John’s to discuss the aquaculture industry’s long-term sustainability in the province. He and several others raised concerns about how interactions between farmed salmon and wild salmon will affect natural habitats.

Hutchens said it is known farmed fish can escape marine cages, adding the threat of infectious salmon anemia (ISA) remains active in light of a recent outbreak on the south coast that led to the destruction of 450,000 farmed salmon.

“We’re told that their processes are the latest, most up-to-date, international best, state of the art, and yet we have ISA this year in a significant way.”

Miranda Pryor, executive director of the Newfoundland and Labrador Aquaculture Industry Association, admitted that while there have been significant investments made in technology, problems can arise.

“I wouldn’t be here if I didn’t believe in our industry (and) believe in how we farm. Are we perfect? No, we’re not. Do escapes occur? Yes, they do.”

However, she said recent years have proven that marine cages can survive storm events, including hurricanes. While fish sometimes escape, those moments are the result of human error. 

“We take full accountability for that. It’s not equipment failure. Our cages hold up.”

Pryor added the aquaculture industry is not an environmentally harmful one.

“We do not want to negatively impact wild salmon (or) wild trout in any way. We’re passionate about the ocean.”

Both Hutchens and Fred Winsor, chairman of the Sierra Club of Canada’s Atlantic chapter, suggest Newfoundland and Labrador would be best served by a land-based version of finfish aquaculture.

“You’re dealing with a natural system — you’re dealing with the ocean,” said Winsor. “The ocean is too complex. ... We know, in the long-term, (land-based aquaculture) is the way we need to go.”

Winsor said his group fields complaints throughout Atlantic Canada. While living in Cape Breton, he said the introduction of aquaculture in that area was shortly thereafter followed by the disappearance of lobster.

He did however voice support for mussel farming, stating it has proven to be a successful endeavour for Newfoundland and Labrador.

Rick Bouzan, president of the Newfoundland and Labrador Wildlife Federation, said his group was appointed by the federal fisheries minister to serve on an advisory committee, and every recommendation it has made concerning aquaculture over the course of 15 years has been ignored.

“I wish I were a multibillionaire, because I’d sue the federal government and DFO (Department of Fisheries and Oceans) for negligence of duty,” he said.

Bouzan would like the aquaculture industry to be subject to an environmental assessment to ensure wild fish stocks are not compromised, adding he considers it to be “a polluting industry.”

Tuesday’s event was hosted by Liberal fisheries critic and MHA for St. Barbe district Jim Bennett, who likened aquaculture to the automotive industry prior to the introduction of seat belts and fuel economy.

“I believe if that analogy would work, we need to go there in aquaculture,” he said.

 

arobinson@thetelegram.com

Twitter: TeleAndrew

 

Comments

  • Username
    John
    - September 8, 2012 at 09:36:14

    “We take full accountability for that. It’s not equipment failure. Our cages hold up.” So what is the penalty if they wipe out the wild fish stocks that are in Conne River or other places? It sounds so grown-up to say such things but in actuality, there would be no consequence if they did destroy the wild salmon population. And when you liken that to someone poaching a salmon or a codfish, who would lose all property that enabled them to commit that unspeakable act, the consequences are not the same at all. If they were, the company would at least lose all property that enabled THEM to destroy optimum wild nutrition and recreation for all future generations. “We’re told that their processes are the latest, most up-to-date, international best, state of the art, and yet we have ISA this year in a significant way.” Words today have no meaning because the public has little memory and information and the government doesn't have any teeth. These elected officials have been placed in trusted positions of power for which they usually have no formal training or knowledge and are expected to make good decisions. Private interests dictate what controls are set in place while scientists and people actually living in a reality where the bottom line isn't the driving factor for decisions aren't heeded. In Cape Breton, their lobster disappeared after the introduction of aquaculture. What will have to disappear here for people like Rick Bouzan to be listened to? According to the article, mussel farming is a success. I haven't researched it but it's my guess that mussels aren't fed anything by those doing the farming. If that's the case then I guess that it's the feed that's causing all the damage. If the salmon were fed a natural diet, the wastage that drifts below the floating cage would only be food for the critters down there (not killing them, like the lobsters). However, since you have massive die-offs of these fish, it's my guess that these fish aren't fed a natural diet and probably get sick easily. I would also guess that they're fed antibiotics on a regular basis, as practiced in the cattle industry (raised on grains instead of grass), leading to the current day problem of antibiotic-resistant bacteria. I would also guess that if these fish aren't fed a natural diet then their nutritional profile would not be the same as that of a wild fish. People going for more than taste are looking for, among other things, DHA and EPA, however, if the fish is fed, say, a corn-based meal which is high in omega 6, it's not going to have those omega 3s in optimal ratios. What has been traditionally a healthy food may, in fact, be disease promoting. “We do not want to negatively impact wild salmon (or) wild trout in any way. We’re passionate about the ocean.” Didn't I just read that the stocks in Conne River have seriously declined since 2001? To me her words belie her actions. If Miranda Pryor cared passionately, she would take at least one piece of the advice offered to her by Mr. Bouzan from the past 15 years.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    John
    - September 8, 2012 at 06:58:04

    “We take full accountability for that. It’s not equipment failure. Our cages hold up.” So what is the penalty if they wipe out the wild fish stocks that are in Conne River or other places? It sounds so grown-up to say such things but in actuality, there would be no consequence if they did destroy the wild salmon population. And when you liken that to someone poaching a salmon or a codfish, who would lose all property that enabled them to commit that unspeakable act, the consequences are not the same at all. If they were, the company would at least lose all property that enabled THEM to destroy optimum wild nutrition and recreation for all future generations. “We’re told that their processes are the latest, most up-to-date, international best, state of the art, and yet we have ISA this year in a significant way.” Words today have no meaning because the public has little memory and information and the government doesn't have any teeth. These elected officials have been placed in trusted positions of power for which they usually have no formal training or knowledge and are expected to make good decisions. Private interests dictate what controls are set in place while scientists and people actually living in a reality where the bottom line isn't the driving factor for decisions aren't heeded. In Cape Breton, their lobster disappeared after the introduction of aquaculture. What will have to disappear here for people like Rick Bouzan to be listened to? According to the article, mussel farming is a success. I haven't researched it but it's my guess that mussels aren't fed anything by those doing the farming. If that's the case then I guess that it's the feed that's causing all the damage. If the salmon were fed a natural diet, the wastage that drifts below the floating cage would only be food for the critters down there (not killing them, like the lobsters). However, since you have massive die-offs of these fish, it's my guess that these fish aren't fed a natural diet and probably get sick easily. I would also guess that they're fed antibiotics on a regular basis, as practiced in the cattle industry (raised on grains instead of grass), leading to the current day problem of antibiotic-resistant bacteria. I would also guess that if these fish aren't fed a natural diet then their nutritional profile would not be the same as that of a wild fish. People going for more than taste are looking for, among other things, DHA and EPA, however, if the fish is fed, say, a corn-based meal which is high in omega 6, it's not going to have those omega 3s in optimal ratios. What has been traditionally a healthy food may, in fact, be disease promoting. “We do not want to negatively impact wild salmon (or) wild trout in any way. We’re passionate about the ocean.” Didn't I just read that the stocks in Conne River have seriously declined since 2001? To me her words belie her actions. If Miranda Pryor cared passionately, she would take at least one piece of the advice offered to her by Mr. Bouzan from the past 15 years.

    Submit a comment

Submit a comment

Submit a comment (we keep all emails private)
Agreement

We ask that users remain courteous. You may not post insulting, discriminatory or inappropriate content, which may be removed at our discretion. We are not responsible for user content and opinions. Use of this site as well as content submission & ownership are governed by our Conditions of Use and Privacy Policy.

Member organizations should be non-profit in nature, and promote legal activities. Any organization found promoting illegal activities or commercial products or services will be deleted from the site.

I agree with these conditions.

Advertising

Newsletter

Please enter your email to receive our free newsletter

Subscribe to news alerts

Coaster Twitter

Recent Announcements

Current Obituaries in The Coaster

Find an Announcement

Find an Announcement
loading...

Advertising