• Print
  • Send to a friend
  • Comment (2)
  •  

The ties that bind are changing

Published on October 27, 2010
Published on October 27, 2010
EDITOR'S VIEWPOINT  RSS Feed

Where have all the children gone?

Topics :
Vanier Institute of the Family , Canada

If you suspected that the Canadian family institution is changing dramatically, you are absolutely right.

The Vanier Institute of the Family concluded, in a report issued early in October, that there is no such entity as the typical family. The report was based on the 2006 Canadian census figures.

While traditional marriages still outnumber other family types, it is rapidly being replaced by the country’s more modern family units, which include single parent, step-parent-blended, same-sex or common law families.

Common-law unions are the fastest growing type of family unit and were 15.5 per cent of all families in 2006. In 1981, common-law unions only amounted to 5.6 per cent of Canadian family units. The 15.5 per cent will surely increase in our next census figures.

Back in 1990, 81 per cent of children under 15 were living with parents who were legally married, but by 2006 that figure had dropped to 66 per cent.

The report stated that today’s families are smaller than in the past and adults wait longer to marry if they tie the knot legally at all.

An interesting fact in the report (some might say disturbing) is that the institute found that there are more couples without children in Canada than those with children and that married couples with children now represent a minority in all Canadian provinces and territories.

Why is this trend happening in our country? Most people in their 50s and 60s can remember the family unit including five or six or more children.

 Two-income families are probably necessary in many Canadian cities and larger towns - women are delaying marriage until their 30s – young couples want to travel and to enjoy the finer things in life - but isn’t it alarming when we realize that most families today are choosing not to have any children at all?

What social and societal problems will this lead to in the future? Who will fill Canadian jobs? Who will pay for the cost of looking after our seniors?

In February of this year a parliamentary report said that Canada’s current birth rate of 1.5 is far below the 2.1 replacement rate necessary and that “a major demographic transition is underway.”

The report also states: “With an older population, spending pressures in areas such as health care and elderly benefits are projected to intensify. At the same time, slower  labour force growth is projected to restrain growth in the economy, which will in turn slow the growth in government revenue.”

So, with a decreasing birth rate, will we see substantial increases in taxation coupled with major cuts to government services amounting to tens of billions of dollars?

It remains to be seen what the future holds, but one thing is certain – our changing family units with smaller numbers of children will have serious consequences for all Canadians in the future.

Editor@thecoaster.ca

 

Comments

  • Username
    Trevor
    - January 12, 2011 at 09:49:22

    I love the comment "young couples want to travel and to enjoy the finer things in life"...there is absolutely nothing finer than the loving, lifelong covenant between a husband & wife. Then to add in the complete joy of having someone call you Daddy or Mommy...there is nothing finer! Does it all come with ups & downs, good & bad, joy & pain....oh absolutely yes! But show me a life without those things whether married or unmarried, children or childless. You can search the whole world over seeking the "finer things" & die very disappointed because nothing finer exists anywhere on this earth. The "finer things"...ha ha, that's all a matter of perspective.

    Submit a comment

  • Username
    Lanny Cox
    - October 27, 2010 at 18:05:36

    I don't see this shift as a bad thing, necessarily. A lot of people my age look at marriage as a tax break and little else. Ambition is on the rise, as stated; opportunity for travel and leisure has grown, women seek careers beyond home-making, and most couples are taking advantage of family planning and birth control, instead of spitting out children they can't support. Canada's common folk are looking further in their goals and aspirations rather than expanding the family tree. It's easy to idealize the large-family life of the early/mid 1900s, but I've heard of plenty of parents/grandparents/relatives growing up with little more than the shoes on their feet. Average quality of life from a financial perspective has risen sharply in that time.. whether that translates to a happier population is up for debate. But more importantly, in your worries regarding the consequences of a shrinking population and its capacity to form a competent work force.. isn't 8% of our country unsuccessfully seeking employment as-is? If we're really that hard-up to fill those service jobs, let's open our doors to competent, educated immigrants! I've seen enough Canadian citizens turn down opportunities at McDonalds and Mary Brown's for welfare for one lifetime. Our economy isn't suffering because there aren't enough folks to work, our economy is suffering because of people living beyond their means through credit cards and loans while refusing to put in the 40 hours a week that qualifies them to live as they do. Our banks are taking all our money through interest because we're too short-sighted to realize we can't actually afford the cars we drive or houses we live in. In closing, the report mentioned states: “With an older population, spending pressures in areas such as health care and elderly benefits are projected to intensify. At the same time, slower labour force growth is projected to restrain growth in the economy, which will in turn slow the growth in government revenue.” Well, we can always draw from all those tax dollars paid into family allowance benefits and welfare programs all those years, can't we? We can always have ten kids to share the task of taking care of us, but what happens when those ten kids get too old to take care of themselves? Overpopulation is a stress on a society all its own. Legitimate social services and worker's compensation claims aside, I, for one, would prefer seeing those dollars going towards folks that have actually done the lifetime of hard work to deserve our support and care.

    Submit a comment

Submit a comment

Submit a comment (we keep all emails private)
Agreement

We ask that users remain courteous. You may not post insulting, discriminatory or inappropriate content, which may be removed at our discretion. We are not responsible for user content and opinions. Use of this site as well as content submission & ownership are governed by our Conditions of Use and Privacy Policy.

Member organizations should be non-profit in nature, and promote legal activities. Any organization found promoting illegal activities or commercial products or services will be deleted from the site.

I agree with these conditions.

Advertising

Newsletter

Please enter your email to receive our free newsletter

Subscribe to news alerts

Coaster Twitter

Recent Announcements

Current Obituaries in The Coaster

Find an Announcement

Find an Announcement
loading...

Advertising